Chosen community: Rocka Village II, Tabang, Plaridel, Bulacan
Rocka Village II is a 13-hectare property located in Plaridel, Bulacan. It is close to shopping centers and is surrounded by numerous schools and hospitals. This location portrays an ideal environment for everyone to live in, but what about its flaws and associated inconveniences?
Let us find that out!
This location was chosen because it is also where I have spent my entire life, and as a resident of Rocka Village II, my objective for this survey is to raise awareness of the issues that continue to bother us all.
A survey was conducted in the community of Rocka Village II in Tabang, Plaridel, Bulacan, to ascertain the most pressing concerns of its residents. A total of nine people were asked, ranging in age from 15 to 40 years old. The individuals who took part in the survey have lived in the village since they were born. The medium of communication was messenger, followed by one face-to-face interview.
The table below shows the demographics of the chosen respondents as well as their community concerns. Their names and addresses are not included for reasons of privacy.
Following the survey, a total of eight community concerns were identified.
(1) Inconsistencies in policy implementation by public officials (mentioned once)
The policies implemented in Rocka Village II are inconsistent, which reflects a lack of hands-on management.
(2) Broken streetlights/Lack of streetlights (mentioned thrice)
According to the respondents, their concern about broken and insufficient streetlights may contribute to accidents and crimes. Although the village has improved in some areas, it continues to lag behind in others.
(3) Monthly due fees (mentioned once)
The collected monthly fees are not maximized and are not used for the improvement of the village.
(4) Charging delivery personnel ten pesos to enter the village (mentioned twice)
Before entering the village, delivery personnel must first pay ten pesos. Two of the eight respondents expressed concern about the action of the homeowners association, stating that the ten pesos collected on delivery personnel is already a significant loss to them.
(5) Inconsistency in garbage collection dates (mentioned twice)
Residents panic and rush to collect their piled-up garbage due to the inconsistency in garbage collection dates. Additionally, delayed collection of garbage waste (biodegradable and non-biodegradable) results in foul odors throughout their areas.
(6) Stray dogs (mentioned once)
The respondent wishes for this to be addressed because stray dogs have the potential to bite or attack someone, which is dangerous.
(7) Road cracks (mentioned once)
Road cracks in certain areas of the village remain unrepaired, causing inconvenience to residents. According to the respondent, authorities prioritize repairing roads that are in good condition rather than those that pose a danger.
However, of the eight community concerns listed, the most frequently expressed concern was the clogged canal.
(8) Clogged canals (mentioned five times)
The most frequently expressed problem by the respondents was the clogged canals. Even when it is not raining, the clogged canals cause flooding in certain areas of the village, which deteriorates further when it does. According to the respondents, this is a significant inconvenience because it contributes to the growth of slippery moss, which can result in accidents. Additionally, clogged canals may serve as a breeding ground for mosquitoes that transmit dengue fever. The homeowners association is not taking any action on this matter. Canals that become clogged are cited as one of the reasons areas become flood-prone. And, as we all know, the Philippines is prone to natural disasters, one of which is excessive rainfall. According to one respondent, they should not be responsible for repairing clogged canals because they pay monthly dues; instead, the authorities should bear the costs. Although Rocka Village II is a flood-free community, its clogged canals indicate otherwise.
The frequency with which each community issue was mentioned is represented in this chart.
In conclusion, the survey results revealed that the roots of the aforementioned eight community problems can be traced all the way back to higher officials. Furthermore, it emphasizes the continued use of a system that does not meet some of the community needs of every individual living in Rocka Village II. The respondents indicated that while some of the issues they face have improved, other parts continue to be a problem. However, the concerns have existed for such a long period of time that residents have grown accustomed to the inconveniences they bring.
The homeowners association and those in positions of authority should be able to provide a space for each resident that satisfies their basic community needs while also protecting them from the eight issues listed above, and possibly more. As monthly dues payers, all residents of this community should be able to feel and see where their money is being spent—and that purpose should be used for nothing less than a more progressive Rocka Village II.
Comments